European designs on Australia only became serious after Captain James Cook was sent by the English government to observe a transit of Venus in Tahiti in 1770. By now the English were very much caught up in the European exploratory spirit and he was instructed, while in the area, to check out New Zealand and, if possible, chart the hitherto unexplored eastern coast of New Holland. In all this he was completely successful, spending six months charting New Zealand and then sailing west as planned. This east coast was sufficiently far from the western coasts that it was entirely possible the two were actually unconnected, and he named the ‘new’ territory New South Wales. He must have seen the Australian environment at its best and gave glowing descriptions of it in his reports to his government. His positive, though fateful and misinformed opinions were summarized in The Voyages of Captain Cook:
“The industry of man has had nothing to do with any part of it, and yet we find all such things as nature hath bestowed upon it in a flourishing state. In this extensive country it can never be doubted but what most sorts of grain, fruit, roots, etc, of every kind, would flourish were they brought hither, planted and cultivated by the hands of industry; and here is provender for more cattle, at all seasons of the year, than can ever be brought into the country.”
Two of the most different cultures imaginable were now on an inevitable collision course. No sooner had the British Empire nonchalantly claimed a large new territory than it was ignominiously turfed out of an old one. In 1782 the American colonies successfully gained independence by prosecuting a war against the empire, carving a new future for themselves and creating all sorts of problems for the aghast British government. Not least amongst these issues was what to do with tens of thousands of convicts, who continued to be sentenced to ‘transportation’, now that the traditional dumping ground was off limits. The other colonies swiftly declined to accept them, and the practice of dropping them off in West Africa was given up on the grounds that this simply meant a nastier death for the transportees than they could have otherwise enjoyed at the end of a noose back home.
Sir Joseph Banks, Cook’s wealthy and influential botanist on the Endeavour, had suggested New South Wales as early as 1779, but it wasn’t until 1786 that Prime Minister William Pitt agreed to the suggestion, then formally put forward by Lord Sydney, the minister responsible for felons. The following year Arthur Phillip’s ‘first fleet’ set out for Botany Bay, less a grand colonial voyage than a handy solution to a pressing problem.
Some forty years later the British, partly scouting for a penal settlement for re-offenders and partly to counter perceived French ambitions, finally made a small encampment in the western half of the continent, at King William Sound (now Albany) in 1826. In 1828 they dispatched a warship to the Swan River to formally claim western New Holland as a colonial territory, and Captain James Stirling, after much persistent lobbying and government vacillation, was finally sent to found the Swan River Colony in 1829.
As is not unusual in the history of the British invasions of Australia, Stirling discounted the local Aboriginal peoples, offering no treaty and ignoring them entirely in his planning. It took decades for Europeans to even begin to understand the Aboriginals’ complex relationship with their land. It is ill understood even today. Most did not care and some, particularly the poor or emancipated, were happy that there were people on a rung lower than theirs. It was assumed that as the Aboriginals did not farm they had no concept or right of ownership; that since they were nomadic they could simply move out of the way; that as their technology was relatively simple so was their culture and indeed so were they as people. From the very beginning there were settlers who considered them sub-human, and right up to the 1960s many Aboriginals believed themselves, not unreasonably, regarded as ‘fauna’.
Today it is vigorously debated how much the early authorities were guided by the policy of terra nullius, the idea that Australia was an empty land, free for the taking. Terra nullius was a legal fiction based on the premise that land ownership was only proved by land cultivation. The colonial authorities did not think that Australia was empty, but that Aboriginal people had no legal claim upon it. At the time it seems likely that whatever angst was occurring in the minds of liberal societies and authorities in England or urban Australia, the reality on the crucial frontier was promoted by the pioneering settler, over which the authorities had little control. For many that reality was one of conflict. Terra nullius was immaterial, there was a future to secure and it was ‘either us or them’.
Disease did a lot of the damage, with thousands of Aboriginals undoubtedly dying of smallpox and flu, syphilis and typhoid. The Europeans’ long association with domestic animals had fermented a rich brew of the beasties and, like the native Americans before them, the native Australians had little defense. Sometimes, however, there were survivors, and some of these could not be persuaded to join a Christian mission or work as a farm hand or join the native police. Then some of the of the most intense confrontations took place. Some Aboriginals fought back, spearing settlers and attempting to drive them back from whence they had come. The response, both official and not, was often savage. There are known instances of whole groups being rounded up and shot wholesale as retribution for something as trivial as the death of a bullock. On the other hand some groups simply tried to maintain their existence, living off the land as their ancestors had done. Here less brutal tactics were sometimes employed by the Europeans, such as the poisoning of their waterholes.
By the late 1860s it was all over bar the shouting. Aboriginal peoples reached some of their lowest populations ever, driven almost entirely from the southwest and with only fragmented peoples clinging to existence on the fringes of European society over much of the rest of the state. Only deep in the northwest deserts and in the Kimberley did their traditional way of life persist relatively untarnished into the 20th century, in parts as late as the 1950s. When in the late 19th century Charles Darwin’s theories gained widespread notice, it was widely expected that Aboriginals would become extinct. Their perceived inferiority meant they could not survive in the face of a more ‘advanced’ people. It was simply a case of the ‘survival of the fittest’.
Captain Stirling also committed the usual Australian mistake of grossly exaggerating the excellence of the potential port facilities and the suitability of the local land for agriculture. Partly as a result of these misplaced notions, the early settlements of Fremantle and Perth got off to a very slow start, despite considerable private backing from English speculators. The finding of the relatively fertile Avon Valley in 1830 and the decisive crushing of Aboriginal opposition at the ‘battle’ of Pinjarra in 1834 did open doors for some settlers, leading to the establishment of a reasonable wool industry, but a generation later in 1850 the entire colony could still only boast a population of 5500 Europeans and the addition of just a couple of other industries including the cutting and export of local sandalwood to China.
Aboriginal people have lived in the southwest, a rich source of vegetation and wildlife, for many thousands of years and a lot of local landscape features are still known by the names given by Nyoongar people. The region was the first of any distance from Perth’s Swan River Colony to be prospected by pastoralists and woodsmen, the earliest in the 1830s. In the decades until the turn of the century settlements gradually developed and wool, timber and horses which were all exported from Koombana Bay.